Wednesday, 27 July 2016

Draft Buy-back Rules- section 115QA of Income Tax Act- Critical Analysis

Draft Buy-Back Rules under section 115QA
Critical Analysis

1.       Under Section 115QA ‘distributed Income” by company on buy- back of shares (not being listed shares) from shareholders is subject to tax 20% in the hands of Company

2.       “Distributed income” means consideration paid by company on buy-back of shares as reduced by the amount, which was received by the company for issue of shares, determined in the manner as may be prescribed.

3.       CBDT has come with draft rules to determine the amount received by company for issue of shares, in various scenarios, in the context of section 115QA, as under;-

a)      Subscription of Shares-  Paid up amount actually received including share premium shall be amount received by company for issue of shares.

b)      Past Capital Reduction – Where any sum has been returned by company in respect of shares on capital reduction, which is presently subject to buy-back, the amount so returned shall be reduced from amount received in respect of those shares and reduced amount shall be considered as amount received by company for issue of shares.

c)       Amalgamation – Upon shares being issued on amalgamation in lieu of shares in amalgamating company, the amount received by amalgamating company in respect of those shares, shall be amount received in respect of shares issued by amalgamated company.

d)      Demerger
i)                    Resulting Company - For shares being issued by Resulting company, the amount received by resulting company on issue of shares shall be : Amount Received by Demerged company on issue of shares x Net book value of assets transferred to Resulting Company/Net worth of Demerged Company.
ii)                   Demerged Company – The amount received by demerged company in respect of original shares, shall be reduced by the amount determined at (i) above

e)      Bonus Shares – NIL Amount.

f)       Convertible Debenture/Bonds – The amount received in respect of Debenture/bonds so converted, shall be considered as amount received by company for issue of shares

g)      Residual Clause – In any other case, the face value of shares shall be considered as  amount received by company for issue of shares

Critical Analysis

1.       Consolidate Approach absent

a)      The draft rules prescribes piecemeal scenarios to determine the amount received in respect of shares issued by company,  but determination of amount received in respect of shares issued, where existing Share capital is comprise of Subscription shares, bonus shares and shares issued on amalgamation, is lacking.

b)      Consider the following case
i.                     Status of Share Capital of Company
S.No
Particulars
Nos
Rs
Shares
Face Value
Share Premium
Amount Received as per Draft rules
1
Shares Subscribed by Shareholders
15,000
150,000
150,000
300,000
2
Bonus Shares
15,000
150,000
-
-
3
Shares Issued on Amalgamation
5,000
50,000
-
10,000

TOTAL
35,000
350,000
150,000
310,000


ii.                   Suppose the company decides to buy-back 10% of its outstanding shares i.e 3500 shares.
iii.                  The point for consideration is how to determine the amount received in respect of 3500 shares issued. The draft rules are silent on this aspect.
iv.                 In this case, whether the residual clause will be applicable, whereby face value of 3500 shares i.e Rs. 35,000 be taken as amount received in respect of such shares?
v.                   Clarity on this aspect is required.


2.       Rule 2 – Consistency missing

a)      The Rule 2 read as under:-
“Where the company had at any time, prior to the buy-back of the share, returned any sum out of the amount received in respect of such share, determined in accordance with this rule, the amount as reduced by the sum so returned shall be the amount received by the company for issue of the share.”

b)      The strike out sentence is missing in the rule, which need to be there, explained as under:-
                                            I.            The Rule provides for deduction of amount repaid on capital reduction from amount received earlier in respect of shares. But the question is how to determine the amount received in respect of those shares originally i.e. will it be in accordance with normal parlance or will it be in accordance with methodology provided in the rules.


                                          II.            Consider the case, where company has earlier issued shares on amalgamation and carried out capital reduction:-
Particulars
Shares (Nos)
Face Value
Share Premium
TOTAL
Amount Received as per rule
Shares Issued on Amalgamation
10,000
100,000
200,000
300,000
60,000
Capital Reduction
1,000
30,000
30,000
Balance
9,000
270,000
30,000


                                        III.            The company has received assets worth Rs. 3,00,000 on amalgamation and issued shares of similar value. So company has received Rs. 3,00,000 in respect of 10,000 shares but the amount received by amalgamating company on shares, in lieu of which amalgamated company has issued 10,000 shares, was Rs. 60,000. (Assumed).
                                        IV.            To maintain consistency with Rule 3 & Rule 4, for the purpose of determining the amount received in respect of 9,000 shares, the value should be taken at Rs. 30,000 instead of 2,70,000

c)       The Rule 3, which provides for determination of amount received on shares issued by amalgamated company, explicitly states that amount received by amalgamating company in respect of shares should be determined in accordance with this rule, which is reproduced as under:-
“Where the share has been issued by a company being an amalgamated company, under a scheme of amalgamation, in lieu of the share or shares of an amalgamating company, then, the amount received by the amalgamating company in respect of such share or shares determined in accordance with this rule, shall be deemed to be the amount received by the amalgamated company in respect of the share so issued by it.”

d)      Thus to maintain parity and uniformity, it is suggested that strike out words be inserted in Rule 2



No comments:

Post a Comment